Ali’s lawyers call no evidence in murder of B.C. girl

Ibrahim Ali’s attorneys have advised the jury in his first-degree homicide trial they won’t be calling any proof in defence of allegations he sexually assaulted and killed a 13-year-old lady in Burnaby.

Defence lawyer Kevin McCullough advised the jury the Crown hasn’t met the burden of proof to search out Ali responsible.

Article content material

Justice Lance Bernard advised the jury Tuesday that closing arguments from each the Crown and defence are anticipated to start in a couple of week.

Article content material

“Which means the evidentiary portion of the trial has concluded. The subsequent stage within the proceedings for you is listening to the closing addresses. In some unspecified time in the future after these are accomplished, I’ll give my closing directions to you after which you’ll start your deliberations on the decision.”

Ali pleaded not responsible to the cost of murdering {the teenager}, whose title has been protected by a publication ban.

The lady’s physique was present in Burnaby’s Central Park in July 2017, hours after her mom reported her lacking.

The jury heard from virtually 50 Crown witnesses, together with police, civilians and consultants.

One of many key witnesses was Christine Crossman, an RCMP forensic biologist, who testified that Ali’s DNA was discovered contained in the physique of the lady.

On cross-examination, defence centered on the very fact Ali’s genetic profile was not discovered elsewhere on the sufferer and advised that “the one that had intercourse” with the teenager is probably not the one who killed her.

The jury additionally heard from cops who first discovered the lady’s physique, those that dealt with DNA and others who served the warrant for Ali’s arrest.

Article content material

The lady’s mom, brother and a good friend additionally testified about their relationships and closing interactions with the lady the day she died.

Forensic pathologist Jason Morin, who performed the post-mortem, testified that the lady had been strangled and had quite a few accidents on her physique.

The jury additionally heard from a sexual assault knowledgeable who testified that the teenager’s accidents strongly indicated that she had been sexually assaulted. Nevertheless, Dr. Tracy Pickett’s testimony beneath cross-examination was by no means accomplished.

Pickett, a specialist in emergency and scientific forensic medication, was discovered useless on Sept. 28.

On Nov. 7, Justice Lance Bernard instructed the jury to ignore Pickett’s testimony and to withstand all hypothesis into her loss of life.

Crown prosecutor Isobel Keeley advised the courtroom throughout her opening assertion in April that proof would present the teenager was strolling by way of the park when she was dragged off a pathway into the forest, then sexually assaulted and strangled.

The defence didn’t reveal its concept of occasions to the jury.

Associated Tales

Choose tells jury in Ibrahim Ali homicide trial to ignore testimony of Crown witness who died