Breadcrumb Path Hyperlinks
Native NewsEnergyColumnistsBusiness
Enmax and Versant contributed $16 million to the political motion committee Maine Power Progress, which opposed the referendum query, the state’s ethics fee web site signifies
Article content material
Calgary’s Enmax Corp. celebrated a ballot-box victory of types this week, though it came about 1000’s of kilometres from house.
The town-owned company received’t be pressured to dump its Maine-based firm, generally known as Versant Energy, an electrical energy transmission and distribution utility that it purchased lower than 4 years in the past for US$1.3 billion.
Article content material
On Tuesday, voters in Maine soundly rejected a referendum query that may have created a brand new state-owned entity, Pine Tree Energy, to ultimately purchase Versant and one other foreign-held agency, Central Maine Energy (CMP), which is managed by Spanish energy firm Iberdrola SA.
Commercial 2
Article content material
“We welcome the referendum end in Maine,” Enmax CEO Mark Poweska stated in an announcement.
“It is a good end result that can have long-term advantages for patrons on either side of the border.”
About 70 per cent of voters within the state rejected the proposal behind Pine Tree Energy.
Supporters of the ballot-box query have been outspent and outraised by teams linked to CMP and Versant by an element of about 40 to 1, in accordance with the Maine Morning Star.
Enmax and Versant contributed $16 million to the political motion committee Maine Power Progress, which opposed the referendum query, the state’s ethics fee web site signifies.
“Actually, the quantity of spending on the a part of the utilities made an enormous distinction,” stated economist Richard Silkman, who endorsed the concept of a consumer-owned utility and is CEO of consultancy Aggressive Power Providers in Portland, Maine.
“The intense concern of those that voted towards was the concept that we might be turning over the electrical grid — because the promoting marketing campaign drummed house — to politicians. Not true.
“The construction that may have been created in Maine was not that a lot completely different from what Calgary has with Enmax and metropolis council.”
Headline Information
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Associated Tales
‘Butt out’: Maine residents resent Enmax’s lobbying in state’s referendum on utilities possession
Opinion: Maine residents interesting to Calgarians in battle over Enmax dividend
Enmax delivers $82-million dividend to Calgary
Enmax’s buy of Maine utility will get inexperienced mild
Enmax’s Maine buy stirs controversy south of the border
Varcoe: Enmax defends $1.8B Maine utility buy, amid criticism over worldwide growth
Enmax makes first acquisition outdoors of Canada with buy of American utility firm
None
Versant, previously generally known as Emera Maine, is a regulated utility with 165,000 prospects within the northern and jap elements of the New England state.
The vote would have led to the obligatory sale of CMP and Versant. It might have represented a significant setback for Enmax, which made its first main transfer outdoors of Canada by agreeing to accumulate Emera Maine for $1.3 billion, together with the belief of about $500 million in debt.
“The factor we have been holding our eye on was the referendum on Versant Energy, however that didn’t move, in order that concern for us has been alleviated,” DBRS Morningstar vice-president Tom Li stated Thursday.
Commercial 4
Article content material
“If the referendum had really handed, then that may have led to fairly a interval of uncertainty for the corporate.”
One other poll field query that was overwhelmingly endorsed by voters in Maine known as for overseas governments and entities to be banned from spending cash in election campaigns and referendums.
For Enmax, the acquisition in Maine was initially contentious when it was introduced in 2019, with some councillors questioning why a municipally owned utility was investing outdoors the nation.
In March 2020, DBRS Morningstar downgraded Enmax’s credit standing to BBB (excessive) from A (low) because of the elevated debt it was taking up. (The company reaffirmed the ranking this July as steady and famous Enmax was executing its company plan to deleverage.)
On the time, Enmax touted the deal as utilizing its sturdy steadiness sheet to broaden.
After the 2019 annual assembly, then Enmax CEO Gianna Manes identified the company’s measurement would enhance by about 25 per cent with the acquisition, and 70 per cent of its earnings would move from its regulated enterprise.
Enmax’s web earnings have risen from $156 million 4 years in the past to $296 million final 12 months, helped by larger energy costs in Alberta.
Commercial 5
Article content material
The company has additionally grown its dividend paid to town, from $50 million in 2019 to $82 million this 12 months.
Final 12 months, Versant’s earnings earlier than curiosity, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) sat at $131 million, the identical as in 2021, and up from $101 million in 2020.
Coun. Andre Chabot stated he initially was involved with the U.S. funding however has since come to imagine it’s a very good strategic transfer for Enmax.
“To be sincere with you, I wasn’t too loopy in regards to the concept of us increasing outdoors of our borders, however the rationale round why they determined to do it, not solely from a diversification perspective however as a result of they have been getting right into a regulated business . . . it’s much more predictable funding,” he stated.
“If we have been to have offered that entity in Maine, we might have realized enormous beneficial properties.”
Nonetheless, the one approach to show that time could be by an precise sale.
Alberta electrical energy marketing consultant Sheldon Fulton stated the referendum in Maine underscores the inherent threat for Enmax — and Calgarians, because the homeowners — of shopping for one other utility out of the country.
He additionally questions if the cash would have been higher spent in Alberta.
Commercial 6
Article content material
“The query is: Ought to a city-owned utility in Alberta be shopping for a overseas utility and working it? It appears to be an overreach of what their tasks are, notably again to the ratepayers in Calgary,” stated Fulton.
“What would have occurred if the vote had gone towards Enmax they usually have been pressured out?”
After Tuesday’s vote, we received’t discover out.
“They need to be thrilled with the vote,” stated Silkman.
“That was an amazing rejection of Pine Tree Energy and that can make it harder to resurrect that initiative in some unspecified time in the future sooner or later.”
Chris Varcoe is a Calgary Herald columnist.
cvarcoe@postmedia.com
Article content material
Share this text in your social community
